Wednesday 22 April 2015

Movie Review - Avengers Age of Ultron: Another fun, thrilling and entertaining instalment of the MCU


Well, it's here.  After almost two years of anticipation, from the moment the title was announced to a roof-raising response at Comic Con, like many fans I have been counting down the months, weeks and days until we can finally see this film.  If fan expectations were high, this film also has to live up to those of audiences and critics - coming as it does after the box-office record breaking, bench-mark genre classic that preceded it.  That's a lot of pressure, even for 'Earth's Mightiest Heroes'.  Does 'Avengers Age of Ultron' live up to expectation?  It depends upon what you're hoping for; if you want to see a film that is even better than its predecessor in terms of being a genre-defining great, well you will be disappointed.  In that respect, this film doesn't hit the heights of 'Avengers Assemble'.  However, if you were hoping for an entertaining, engrossing, crowd-pleasing, spectacular blockbuster - and more Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU) excitement - then yes, this film certainly delivers.

The film opens with a thrilling sequence showing the Avengers attacking a Hydra fortress, attempting to recover Loki's sceptre (which apparently went AWOL during the SHIELD/Hydra snafu).  Here they encounter two 'enhanced' humans - Pietro and Wanda Maximoff (Aaron Taylor-Johnson and Elisabeth Olsen, respectively), given powers by Hydra through experiments with the sceptre, and who are not fans of the Avengers at all.  This scene starts the film with the same gleeful thrill that underpinned the first Avengers film - seeing the team together, kicking ass and being all-round generally awesome; however, as the team split off to fulfil individual objectives as part of the mission, it must be said it does feel to lose its impetus a little.  But quickly after this the wheels are set in motion for the film's main plot, and things get back on track.  After recovering the sceptre Tony 'Iron Man' Stark (Robert Downey Jr) discovers something that leads him to revive a dormant defence/peace-keeping initiative.  Working with Bruce 'Hulk' Banner (Mark Ruffalo), the resultant AI construct Ultron (voiced and motion-captured by James Spader) turns out to not be what they were hoping for, or intending; Ultron hates The Avengers, and has fairly genocidal ideas about how to achieve peace and save the world.

Can the team hold together in the face of Ultron's scheme?  Let's say they are fairly tested...

Whereas the first film had to spend a lot of time setting up the reasons for drawing this team together - some might argue, at the cost of a substantial plot - this film doesn't need to do that; in fact, Writer/director Joss Whedon clearly was aware of this perceived flaw with the first film, so here he keeps the plot driving forward at a brisk pace.  In some places this benefits the film, giving some scenes a sense of urgency; in other places it leads to a reliance on exposition heavy dialogue that flies by so quickly you're in to the next scene wondering 'hang on, how did they know that/ How did they figure that out?'  Whilst things seems to work out conveniently and quickly at times, the film moves at such pace you don't dwell on the fact the plot does occasionally wobble due to this.  It is surprising that Whedon has taken this route - he could have easily taken the success of the previous film as license to be indulgent and make the plot and key scenes run to a bloated degree, but it is refreshing he has chosen not to.  Perhaps other writer/directors could take some notes from this... *cough*Nolan*cough*

If certain elements of the plot will have you thinking 'hang on, wait a minute...' when you think about it later, there is no question of Whedon's attention to character, as each of the Avengers is equally well-served as they were in their last film.  Each are given scenes that show a deepening emotional depth to their arcs - Stark's desire to see and end for the need for the Avengers, Steve 'Captain America' Rogers (Chris Evans) growing comfort with his role in the team, and the world; and the deepening relationship between Banner and Natasha 'Black Widow' Romanov (Scarlett Johansson).  The latter pair get a scene which genuinely tugs at the heart strings, as the notoriously secretive super-spy begins to lay her true-self bare to someone she feels she can really trust.  But, of course, it's not all heavy, emotional beats - Whedon is a master of witty one-liners, and there are some absolutely cracking, laugh out-loud lines shared between the team.  An early scene, in which the team celebrate their success at Stark's 'Avengers Tower', is destined to become an absolute classic quote-fest; believe me, you will see a great number of internet memes and gifs come from this.

The Maximoff Twins - aka Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch - are well handled additions to the cast.

Pleasingly, when it comes to new characters, Whedon proves a safe pair of hands.  When superhero films have added these in the past there has been a tendency to do so at the cost of muddled plots and losing focus on principal characters.  The introduction of the Maximoff twins - better known to comic fans as Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch - could have done this, but they are handled well; they do not 'upstage' any of the existing characters, their motivations and character arcs are clearly defined, and they are given their hero moments, just as the rest of the cast.  Their powers look effective on the screen - there was a fear that this MCU incarnation of Quicksilver would pale in comparison to 'X-Men Days of Future Past's scene-stealing appearance - but here there is a functional, un-showy approach that fits with the rest of the film's depiction of all the characters and their powers/abilities.  The only slight issue is their East-European accent, which Olsen seems to handle better than Taylor-Johnson - this proves the only quibble about these portrayals.

As well as the Maximoffs, Whedon introduced one of the comic's most formidable villains to the MCU; and by and large, Ultron is handled well.  Perhaps his (its?) introduction is a little rushed in terms of setting up the various 'issues' the character has about The Avengers and solving world peace through, erm, mass-extinction, and maybe we could have seen a little more of the insanely murderous side of the character.  But those qualms aside, Ultron is a deliciously fiendish and imposing villain - you never doubt he has the power to carry through with his schemes, or that he justifies the combined response of the whole Avengers team - one-on-one, they're no match for Ultron.  As well as that, with Whedon's witty script and Spader's seductive-yet-dangerous tones, he is an entertaining and fun villain, too.

Ultron is dangerous, crazy, yet strangely likeable - thanks to Whedon's writing and Spader's performance.

Other characters sadly don't come off as well - recurring comic villain Baron Strucker (Thomas Kretschmann) gets a decent line, but then is side-lined; Andy Serkis appears too briefly as Ulysses Klaw (hopefully we'll see more of him in 'Black Panther'...); and the introduction of Vision, played by Paul Bettany (he's on the posters, so talking about him isn't a spoiler!) will bemuse general audiences even while it delights comics fans.  His earnestness and philosophically-slanted talk might go over some people's heads, or seem ill-fitting with the rest of the film to others.  Thankfully, Whedon knows when to add a witty line or moment to allow the character to also prove a fun addition, so his presence doesn't ever feel as jarring as it might have been.  It's worth adding that he is impressively realised, the borders between Bettany's performance and the CGI are almost imperceptible at times.

This film is heavily reliant on CGI, and effectively so - but to a point that some may feel it is overloaded.  But in order to realise Ultron, his army of drones, and some of the spectacular scenes that take place in the film, there was arguably no other way of doing these than through CGI.  That said, the film looks good, it arguably has a more 'cinematic' sheen than the first did.  Each set-piece is meticulously planned and executed, especially the much-anticipated fight between Hulk and Iron Man (in his Hulk-Buster suit), which has some soon-to-be iconic moments, and (literally) brings the house down.  There's an argument that the finale, in some respects, replays the battle between Avengers and faceless minions (last time alien Chitauri, this time robots) too closely, but it is done in such a way that is logical - and again, has some really major stakes to it.

You're going to see some, if not mixed, then lukewarm reviews for this film.  As I said, it follows a classic film; not only this, it follows two films ('Captain America The Winter Soldier' and 'Guardians of the Galaxy') that not only exceeded expectations, proved to be genre classics in their own rights also.  This film doesn't quite hit the heights of any of these films - in the case of 'Avengers Assemble', there was no way it could match the geek-gasmic rush of bringing this team together on screen for the first time; and in the case of 'Winter Soldier', there was no plot development that blew me away as much as the SHIELD/Hydra reveal in that film did.  So 'Avengers Age of Ultron' is a victim of the success of its predecessors in that respect, and I think people may be negative about it because of this.  On its own terms though, it arguably wears its philosophy too much on its sleeve (coming after the likes of 'The Dark Knight' and 'Winter Soldier' that have some meaty subtext); and if you were expecting to see some darkening and fracturing of certain relationships in the team, feeding in to next year's 'Captain America Civil War', the film doesn't go as far as you might have expected.

Does this mean the film is a failure?  No, not in any way.  It lives up to its predecessor, and every other Marvel Studio film, by being an entertaining, fun, funny and spectacular action-blockbuster.  Comic fans, super-hero movie fans, and general movie audiences will come away from this film feeling satisfied and entertained.   It continues Marvel Studio's almost impeccable run, and is yet another solid entry to their cannon.  Viewed on its own terms, it is a successful summer blockbuster movie - even if it can't quite match up to a classic forebear.  But then again, it was unlikely to; but that doesn't mean I didn't enjoy it enough that I would watch it again, and again.  As the end credits rolled I turned to my friend and said "can we watch it again?"  And there aren't many films, I should imagine, that most people would want to do that with - surely the proof that this is one of the most enjoyable film experiences you'll get at the cinema.

Thursday 16 April 2015

Monthly Marvel Musings: How great was Netflix's 'Daredevil' series??!

We are now a week away from 'Avengers Age of Ultron' being released (here in the UK - sorry, my American friends!), and I couldn't be any more excited.  It's gearing up to be an exciting time for fans of the Marvel Cinematic Universe; this week saw the release of a pretty fun Ant-Man trailer; AKA Jessica Jones is well in to production; Captain America Civil War starts filming; and that means we'll soon find out who will be playing the new Spiderman (in the MCU, no less!).  So much to talk about, idly speculate, and - most importantly - enjoy; but before any of that, this past weekend saw almost 13 hours of fantastic Marvel entertainment released to watch...

MONTHLY MARVEL MUSINGS


So, how great was Netflix's 'Daredevil' series?  (Warning - Spoilers!!!)


Like many other people, I spent the weekend devouring all 13 Episodes of Netflix's first co-production with Marvel - and what an entertaining, gripping, exciting, mesmerising and (more than occasionally) flat-out awesome series it is too.  It struck me as a series that could be enjoyed by almost all audiences, regardless of whether they are fans of the MCU or not, or even if they don't care for 'Superhero' or 'comic book' stories.  The producers promised a 'street-level' hero and story, and that's just what they gave us: a gritty, tough and surprisingly plausible crime thriller, populated with interesting characters, shocking deeds of infamy, and jaw-dropping acts of heroism.  On top of it all, it took a beloved comic book character and not only treated him (and his cast of friends and foes) with seriousness and respect, but drew upon years of top-notch story-telling by great writers, to show that this genre is equally at home on TV as it is on the big screen (in some ways, even more so).

The cherry on the top is that it takes place in the MCU, and the fact that we now have a 'Daredevil' vigilante who is just as much part of it as Tony Stark, Captain Rogers, or Alien demi-gods.  This is very exciting, and there is a lot that can be said about the potential this opens up for future stories in the MCU, but before I get in to all of that I thought it worth talking about 'Daredevil's quality as a TV series in its own right.  And it's fair to say that it stands up extremely well against the best series currently out there; it is  consistently absorbing viewing, and (apart from one or two scenes which feel like they play out a little longer than perhaps necessary) it rarely feels to slow down.  Sure, there is a little fat that could be trimmed, perhaps it could have worked just as well in 12 episodes instead of 13, but where a scene does feel like it lasts longer than it might on other shows or in a film, this usually allows time for character development.  And that's important when adapting stories and characters in this genre, as the secret to their longevity is the cast of heroes, friends and villains that is part of them.

D'Onofrio; Dawson; Cox; Ann Woll; Henson; the whole cast are uniformly brilliant in this.

The series excels in this respect, as every character is perfectly cast, and is played just as perfectly by each actor.  Charlie Cox is likely to forever be associated with the role, bringing all the elements of determination, anger, intelligence, moral searching, and humour that Matt Murdoch should be portrayed with - both as the crusading lawyer, and the driven vigilante.  Elden Henson makes his Lawyer associate 'Foggy' Nelson not only the 'wingman' buddy almost everyone would love to have - funny, genuinely conscientious of his friends happiness and feelings - but an articulate and persuasive attorney.  Karen Page, their first client who becomes their secretary, becomes more than a 'damsel in distress' or love interest; thanks to the script and Deborah Ann Woll's performance she is tenacious and smart, yet has the right amount of vulnerability for someone who has been through what she has (and a shady past to boot).

As well as this, the portrayal of classic villain Wilson 'Kingpin' Fisk is one of the greatest ever comic villains put on screen.  Played by Vincent D'Onofrio, there has been talk of awards nods of his performance, and justifiably so; this is a villain who is nuanced, whose motivations are relatable to the point that they could be considered noble; and who is rendered surprisingly human in his vulnerable love for Vanessa Marianna (Ayelet Zurer).  Yet he is a brutal, violent sociopath, carrying out some shocking acts of violence with his own hands, and sanctioning yet more, in order to fulfil his ambitions.  This series makes the most of one of the most interesting hero/villain dynamics in comics - ironically, both Murdoch and Fisk want to make their city 'a better place', and interestingly, both are going about it in ways that are illegal - vigilantism in contrast to corruption, murder and mobsters.  Their physicality is just as dramatic a contrast as the comics - while D'Onofrio doesn't have the sheer size as Fisk in the comics (which would be pretty much impossible), here he has impressively bulked up to become an imposing mountain of a man.  He is not just the master-mind behind it all, when he needs to he can throw a punch - he is a formidable opponent, and when he takes on Murdoch you fear for the hero; despite his martial arts prowess, he is towered over by Fisk, and it is hard to see how he could land a blow capable of making an impact on Fisk.

As well as getting the casting and portrayal of these characters absolutely right, the series is impressively shot, and has some truly genre-defining moments.  There's no green screen here, no special effects (apart from one or two places where it makes sense); the setting of Hell's Kitchen looks and feels real, especially during the murky, neon lit night scenes.  If you didn't think action on TV could rival movies, some of the scenes in this series absolutely put that thought to rest.  The action is fantastically choreographed and filmed - it is physical, it is brutal.  At the end of the second episode there is a fight scene that is jaw-droppingly good.  It evokes classic movies like 'Oldboy' (the corridor hammer fight), is technically impressive (all done in one shot), is truly thrilling - and on top is true to the character and the gritty, realistic depiction this show succeeds in achieving.  Murdoch is hurt, visibly tires throughout the fight - but is fiercely driven as he takes on the thugs that are holding a child captive.  It is such a great scene it really lays down a challenge to future Marvel films to up their ante with their action scenes; as well as this it will be remembered as one of the greatest moments in the MCU down the line.

Really, this superb fight scene has to be seen to be believed.

But what sets this series apart from the rest of the MCU is just how 'grown-up' it is.  Not only is the level of violence - with pretty clear, bloody consequences (on more than one occasion a broken bone pierces through the flesh) - greater, and more realistically portrayed than the Marvel films, it tells a story with some mature themes and moral questions.  Ostensibly Murdoch is our hero, fighting trafficking mobsters and seeking justice for victims of crime, but when we see him torturing one of them for information, does he cross a line in to villainy?  Is he, or Karen, right to continue putting the lives of those closest to them at risk, in their obsessive pursuit of justice?  It handles the material with a level of seriousness not seen since 'The Dark Knight'; in fact, if you were somehow able to condense it down to a 2 1/2 hour feature film, it would rival that classic in terms of being a great, comic-inspired crime thriller.  When you add this to the street-level setting, and the down-to-earth way that Murdoch's abilities (never referred to as 'Powers') are portrayed, you have another reason why this series is not just for comic lovers or super-hero fans.

The Marvel Cinematic Universe now has a 'Daredevil'..!

The outfit that Murdoch eventually dons is a fitting 'real-world' take on the classic comic version.

But of course, Daredevil is part of the wider Marvel Universe, and this series is part of the MCU that began with 'Iron Man' in 2008.  And it is done so in a way which never feels intrusive, or distracting to the setting, characters and the story being told.  There are background details that remind viewers of this - newspaper cuttings referencing the events of 'The Incredible Hulk' and 'Avengers Assemble' - and a joke about gangsters being overwhelmed by a man who doesn't have an Iron suit or a magic hammer.  In fact, the series makes use of the destruction wrought upon New York to feed in to the redevelopment of Hell's Kitchen (which was actually redeveloped in the 1980's & '90's, having previously been an infamous hot-bed of crime and slum land-lords), allowing for its tale of organised crime.  In terms of story-telling potential, I believe this series further highlights how much potential there is to continually keep the films and TV versions of the multitude of characters fresh and interesting.  In this case, you've got a legal drama, crime procedural, investigation thriller as well as vigilante action.  There are no end of genres or 'takes' you could apply to stories with the Marvel characters (just last year we've had a conspiracy thriller, space opera and time-travel story!), and this series demonstrates it effectively.

On top of that, 'Daredevil' features a type of character that has yet to appear in the MCU - ironically while being one of the staples of superhero comics: the costumed vigilante.  We've had super-science, super-tech, super-human extra-terrestrials, and alien-altered (in)humans, but nothing like Matt Murdoch.  Despite his abilities, or 'gifts' - which only as the series progresses are the viewer allowed to feel are little more than enhanced by circumstance and training - feel pretty mundane in comparison to some of the characters we've seen in the films and 'Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.' series.  The stakes that Murdoch takes on aren't as great as when Iron Man, or Cap, or any of the Avengers strike out - all he wants to do is make his city 'a better place'.  This doesn't mean they feel any less urgent or gripping as the big screen Marvel adventures; but they are more intimate, as we're drawn in to the lives of the all the characters.  Straight away this is going to be one of the markers of Netflix's other three Marvel series (AKA Jessica Jones, Luke Cage, and Iron Fist).  These heroes don't have a world saving agenda; they want to protect their loved-ones and communities from harm.  I expect this will be a recurring idea of each of these series, and will underpin their teaming up for 'The Defenders' mini-series (I'll discuss this further below).

Having said that, there are many comic story-lines where they step alongside the 'mightier' heroes of the Marvel roster; Luke Cage, for example, has been in the Avengers line up.  With 'Civil War' coming next year, it would be a great opportunity for Daredevil to appear alongside some of the other established characters in the MCU, and justifiably so.  With the story being driven by the Government introducing a law that requires 'superheroes' to declare themselves and register their identities, Murdoch would risk a great deal if he submitted to this.  For starters, there is little doubt Fisk would take his revenge against Murdoch and all those associated with him (more on this later...), so there's good reason that he would stand alongside Captain America and his opposition of this law.  Even if it was just one scene, or one shot, where Daredevil met with or stood with Captain America's allies, it would be an excellent opportunity to establish further links between the character and the MCU; in fact, not doing so would really seem a wasted opportunity to me.

Then there's the question of how this series fits in with the time-line of the established MCU; clearly, it takes place after the events of 'Avengers Assemble', but the question is, how would the events of 'Captain America The Winter Solder', 'Age of Ultron' and 'Civil War' impact on the character in the future?  To be fair, given as the everyday average citizens of Hell's Kitchen are just trying to get on with their everyday lives, the fall-out of the SHIELD/Hydra revelations probably wouldn't make too much difference - especially to the clientele of Nelson & Murdoch Attorneys At Law!  However, when events transpire to bring Murdoch together with Luke Cage, Jessica Jones and Iron Fist for 'The Defenders', it's clear that the absence of SHIELD would contribute to that (I'll explore this a little bit more below).  Further down the line, after 'The Defenders', I think 'Civil War' could have an effect on what takes place in the next Daredevil series, as the issue of revealing identities is one that could play a big part in that - but before we talk about that, it's worth mentioning how this series is linked to the other Netflix Marvel shows, leading to 'The Defenders'.

Netflix's Marvel Shows - Almost an 'MCU' in their own right!

'Daredevil' is such a great show that, even if it wasn't linked to the MCU, it would still be a brilliantly executed take on the characters and stories on its own terms; and just as its MCU links are subtle but fun, there are pointers to the other three Marvel shows Netflix are making, as well as their team up as The Defenders.  For a start, there's the character of Claire Temple (played by Rosario Dawson), who in the comics is known as Night Nurse, patching up Daredevil and other heroes after their various battles.  Introduced in Episode 2, she talks about another man she knew called 'Mike' who 'also had secrets'.  Interestingly, the character has links to Luke Cage's past, so it could be him she's referring to (funnily enough, the man playing Cage is actually called Mike!).  Other than that, the links to 'AKA Jessica Jones' and 'Luke Cage' aren't immediately clear from this show.  I think that Jessica Jones will offer an interesting contrast to 'Daredevil'; whilst Murdoch has been largely successful in his vigilantism (with often exhilarating effect), Jones wasn't; leading to a back-story where she has been left with PTSD.  Instead she is a low-key private investigator, keeping her head down and out of the attention of the law.  Clearly there is still going to be the gritty, street-level focus of 'Daredevil', but it's likely this will be an even deeper and intimate take - rather than political and high-level schemes and machinations, initially the focus will be on individual people from the neighbourhood.  I wouldn't count against her exposing something with wider implications though!

What surprised me was that there were actually at least two significant nod forwards to the 'Iron Fist' series - and that's mainly because Iron Fist has more mystical, even supernatural elements, in contrast to the very plausible, 'real world' feel of 'Daredevil'.  As many have pointed out, the packets of Heroin distributed by the Chinese gang are marked with the symbol of Iron Fist villain Steel Serpent; then there's the gang leader, Madam Gao, who is clearly a lot more than she seems by the way she sends Murdoch flying with just her palm!  When she states she's going to her home, which is further away than China, it's believed this is a reference to K'un-Lun - a Mystical city that is one of the 'Seven Capital Cities of Heaven', which occasionally manifests on Earth in Tibet.  A lot of what under pins Iron Fist is, compared to the streets of Hell's Kitchen, pretty far out.  That character's powers are mystical, going beyond martial arts prowess so that he literally manifests powers giving him, to all intents and purposes, 'iron fists'.  This series will be the last to come out before 'The Defenders', so building up to these elements is going to take some work.  It's likely some of this will take place throughout 'AKA Jessica Jones' and 'Luke Cage', as early word has it that they'll have dealings with other people with 'powers'; it could well be the case that at least one of these have channelled something 'mystic' or 'supernatural' to gain (or even be cursed with?) their powers/abilities.

Iron Fist, Jessica Jones, Daredevil, and Luke Cage - in their comic forms...

Given how successful the realisation of all the characters in the MCU has been so far, at this stage I'm confident Iron Fist and all the mystical/supernatural goings on can be realised on screen in an effective and believable manner; but at this stage it's possible to see how this could be a factor in what brings the characters to team up in 'The Defenders' - it's likely that they uncover a threat to New York/Hell's Kitchen that has elements bringing them all together: a legal conspiracy, a personal issue, criminal enterprises, with a mystical/supernatural element.  Episode 7 of 'Daredevil', 'Stick', dropped some pretty big hints that the Japanese gang involved in Fisk's schemes could play a big part of this; together with his former mentor, Murdoch stops them bringing in what is apparently a 'weapon' called 'Black Sky'.  It turns out this is in fact a child, kept in multiple chains - could it be a superhuman?  An 'avatar' for something mystical/supernatural?  Either way, Stick suggests it could destroy the whole city Murdoch is fighting to protect.  A later scene depicts Stick conferring with a character we can only see the back off, but is likely to be a recurring Daredevil character called Stone.  The pair suggest there's some big trouble brewing; earlier Stick informs Murdoch he was training him to prepare for a 'war', and in this later scene Stone asks Stick whether Murdoch will ready "when the gate opens."  What that signifies (a literal gate?  A metaphorical one?  A 'supernatural' one?) isn't clear - but it suggests something big is going to kick off in the future!  And it could well involve some long established antagonists from Daredevil's comics...

As Fisk tries to get rid of the black-clad vigilante that's been causing him problems, he tasks the head of the Japanese gang to send one of his 'operatives' to take Murdoch out.  Turns out that this man, Nobu, is a ninja bad-ass who very nearly dispatches Murdoch!  Although it's not explicitly stated, it's hard not to draw parallels with The Hand, a clan of Ninjas who have caused problems for Daredevil in the comics.  His conflicts with them have a personal element too, as apparently Stick belongs to a rival order called The Chaste; the two factions were a single order, but then split and have been at war since.  If Nobu was overseeing the delivery of a 'weapon' to New York; and if he IS part of The Hand; and given that Stick is anticipating something big kicking off soon, it's highly likely that The Hand will be involved in whatever scheme brings Daredevil, Jones, Cage and Iron Fist together to become The Defenders.  I'm certain that, over time and the course of the next Marvel Series on Netflix, it'll be possible to see exactly what this will be.  It will certainly be fun seeing the four heroes come together (hopefully we'll see a role for the likes of Foggy, Karen and Claire in the events), but beyond that there has still been no confirmation of a second Daredevil series.  I'm sure there will be, given the acclaim levelled at this one - and there are elements from the comics which would make for some great stories on TV...

What next for Daredevil after 'The Defenders'?

As Episode 13 of 'Daredevil' ends we have Matt Murdoch's vigilante alter ego fully established (costume and all; if you were to ask of my thoughts on the costume, initially I was sceptical, but having seen it in action, and having watched the story of how it was developed, I'd say it not only makes sense but looks the part.  Clearly meant to be more resistant and armoured for practical reasons, it is in keeping with the show's grounded and plausible tone).  It would be an absolute waste if Netflix decided not to make another 'Daredevil' series, certainly the material they can draw upon gives them many reasons to do at least one more series.  There are two great and seminal story arcs which could form the basis of this series - the Elektra arc, and a story written by Frank Miller called 'Born Again'.  Tantalisingly, the foundations of bringing Elektra in to a future series of 'Daredevil' were laid in a flashback scene where Foggy and Murdoch are in college and he refers to a Greek girlfriend with whom 'things didn't work out'.  Of course, we've seen Elektra on the big screen before (less said about that the better), but in the comics she is a former girlfriend of Murdoch's who, following the death of her father, trained with Stick to become an assassin but then joined The Hand.  She is then hired by Wilson Fisk to take out Foggy - complicated by the fact that she is back in Murdoch's life, having resumed their relationship; and further complicated when another assassin, Bullseye (yes, the one played by Colin Farrell in that film), turns up to target her for NOT carrying out the hit.  The film sort of tried to adapt this storyline, but with this TV series format there's the chance to do it proper justice.

Foggy, Karen and Murdoch - friends and colleagues, but things could get difficult for them in the future...

'Born Again' is considered a classic story in its own right, and is one that could provide a small but exciting cross over with the big-players of the MCU, as The Avengers briefly pop up; however, the emphasis is rightly on the dynamic between Fisk and Murdoch, as well as playing upon his relationships with his closest friends.  In the comics, the story sees Karen - having fallen on desperately hard times - give up the secret that Murdoch is actually Daredevil.  This information is obtained by Fisk, who proceeds to destroy Murdoch's life in its entirety, bit by bit.  However, after failing to kill him, Murdoch re-assumes the mantle of Daredevil and comes after Fisk.   This would be a perfect arc for the next series to tackle, having already established Fisk as utterly ruthless and unforgiving of any slight against him.  Seeing as Murdoch's vigilantism seriously caused his plans problems - that's before you get on to the legal and investigative activities of his associates Karen and Foggy that played a part in his arrest - Fisk would take any opportunity to go after him without any mercy.  Because of the prominence of issues around secret identities, and also how this plays a part in 'Civil War', there's an opportunity to have some kind of cross-over with other parts of the MCU.  The comic story features an appearance by The Avengers, taking down a super-villain called 'Nuke', which Daredevil plays a role in.  I would suggest that it wouldn't need to occur like this, but you could tie in the events of 'Civil War' by having a scene play out in the midst of the carnage of one of that film's confrontations.  According to Comic Book Resources, the portrayal of The Avengers in 'Born Again' is how they might appear to average bystanders - terrifying yet awesome.  As the 'Daredevil' series is much more down to earth, there's an opportunity to show how ordinary people would react to them, and the aftermath of their confrontations.  There wouldn't necessarily be any need for those characters to appear, but it could be a fun moment for us MCU fans, that wouldn't distract from the focus of the story.

Hopefully we'll see a moment (or maybe more) where Daredevil crosses paths with the likes of The Avengers on screen...

Ultimately, that we can discuss where a second series of 'Daredevil' could go and what it could feature shows how successful the first one is: it is a great series in its own right, telling a satisfying self-contained story, but it leaves the viewer wanting to see more of the characters.  The fact that it is also part of the MCU just adds to the fun - it would blow a lot of comic geeks' and superhero fans' minds to see Daredevil on the big screen alongside Captain America and so many other characters.  Hopefully it will happen - but at least it is a genuine possibility, which is just another reason why it is so exciting to be a fan of the MCU at the moment.

It'd be cool if they can work this iconic depiction of Daredevil in to the next series some where...



Well, I hope you've enjoyed this detailed look at Daredevil; there'll be more Marvel Musings next month, when I will write a spoiler-filled analysis of 'Age of Ultron'...

Tuesday 14 April 2015

Movie Review - John Wick: Slick gunplay action in need of a wittier script


'John Wick' creates a fun action-movie world - where black-clad assassins are paid in literal gold coins, where they frequent a secret society with its own bars and hotel - it's a shame that the script doesn't match this, or the kinetic gunplay, with some hard-boiled one-liners.  The film sees Keanu Reeves' titular retired hitman (known as 'The Boogeyman') grieving over the loss of his wife - but a glimpse of hope appears when she leaves him a puppy to care for, in order to help him grieve and move on.  This is taken from him when the cowardly, scrawny, rat-faced son of a Russian mobster (played by 'Game of Thrones' Alfie Allen) steals his car and kills this puppy.  Yes, it's a ridiculous set up, the film sort of knows this - but doesn't spend too long dwelling on this fact before getting down to Wick's quest for revenge.

The film has some cool touches, creating this alternate world where assassins have their own hotel and bar - with rules stating they can't engage in business there.  The concierge (played by Lance Reddick) and owner (Ian McShane) are interesting characters, played with the right mixture of knowingness and commanding presence by the respective actors; sadly they aren't in the film as much as they should have been.  The action scenes, helmed as they are by stunt co-ordinator-turned-director Chad Stahelski, are slick and impressively staged.  The only draw-back to these are that they do such a good job of making Wick the legendary bad-ass that makes mobsters fearful of even his name, that there isn't much in the way of genuine threat.  Having said that, Michael Nyqvist is clearly having fun as mobster Viggo, and it's good to see him in a physical role after playing disgraced journalists ('The Girls With the Dragon Tattoo'), and slippery, apocalypse-starting academics ('MI:IV').


The film sees Keanu Reeves back in Action mode - though this is about gunplay, rather than Martial Arts prowess...

Although the film is stylish to the point of ludicrousness - and knowingly so, you can detect - it perhaps doesn't go far enough to reinforce that this isn't taking itself seriously.  Whilst it wouldn't have needed endless jokes and one-liners (which would have pushed it too far in to being an out-and-out parody), it could have done with a few more moments like the films biggest laugh, when a cop visits Wick after he's taken out a team of would-be assassins.  Spotting a corpse on the floor behind you, the cop nervously suggests he'll leave Wick to it - a moment that plays out its humour simply and effectively, but highlights that the script could have done with some more moments like these.


Allen and Nyqvist are effective in their roles as the main antagonists, but aren't we getting bored of the Russian Mobsters cliché?

Outside of the action, most of the performances are pretty wooden (which you'd expect from Reeves, but not from Willem Dafoe) - again, perhaps this is part of the film's 'knowingness', but again it could have done more to highlight this.  Add to this a story beat in the final act that doesn't mesh entirely well with Wick's stated revenge mission, and you have a film where you can see tantalising glimpses of a memorable genre classic.  It could have at once celebrated and sent up the stylings and conventions of the genre, from the '80's to the present day (surely 'Taken' could have taken a metaphorical kicking from this?), if it had a script with more effective humour in it.  What we're left with is a reasonably fun action-film that won't set the world on fire, but evokes some of the low-budget efforts that have normally been sent straight to video in the last 20 years or so.  It could have been so much more, though.

Thursday 2 April 2015

The Most Relentlessly Awesome Films Ever: Avengers Assemble

Today is only a mere 3 weeks from the UK première of the film I am looking forward to  - and geeking out over hard - more than any other this year: 'Avengers Age of Ultron'.  While we chomp at the bit to see the sequel, I thought it a good excuse to look back at what made the first film so great...


THE MOST RELENTLESSLY AWESOME FILMS EVER - PART EIGHT:

AVENGERS ASSEMBLE (2012)




'Superhero'.

'Team'.

On their own, each of those words can evoke exciting story possibilities and images - but put together the potential is even greater and exciting.  If you're thinking of cinematic potential then this is even more so - but at the same time the risks that go with those are also multiplied.  For every great Superhero movie, there are as many (if not more) that have disappointed.  And when these films have tried to introduce more characters, to expand a 'franchise', well the results haven't been successful.  Then you have the added unknown of getting several characters, established in their own films (and film franchises) - how do you bring them together and make it feel like they're all equal?  And what do you present them with that's a threat big enough to justify their coming together?  Going in to Marvel's 'The Avengers' (or 'Avengers Assemble' as we have to call it here in the UK), the dangers that it wouldn't work always seemed like they would outweigh the potential for excitement and fun.

But when the film hit back in 2012, smashing Box Office records like a green rage monster, any of these risks, these doubts that it wouldn't work, were quickly forgotten.  Yes, it's not a perfect film; and yes it does teeter occasionally on its tightrope walk - threatening to slip in to cheesiness or campness on occasion; but it holds it together enough to provide an exhilarating finale that is exciting, joyous, entertaining and crowd-pleasing.  So much so, in fact, that I would argue there is a strong case to make that this is the greatest Comic Book Superhero movie of them all.  Even on those occasions it almost feels like it's going to fall apart, Joss Whedon's fantastic and endlessly quotable script, and the charismatic cast that simply own their roles, keep the film on track.

The Avengers: before they fight together, they usually fight.  Each other...

Apparently Whedon really had to wrestle the script to completion, stating that the biggest challenge was to justify them becoming a team in the first place.  You can imagine as well that it was probably tough to convey each character's voice too.  And offer a satisfying story, and one where the potential of portraying these Superheroes working together on screen is fulfilled.  So the first thing you have to acknowledge is how great Whedon's script is; full of so many witty and endlessly quotable lines, for each and every character.  And what's more, they're so right for each one - we already knew that RDJ could deliver a snarky line with zest and style, or that Thor could be the focus of humorous fish out of water moments - but it's not just these two who get their laughs, and never at the expense of making fun of the characters or trying to make them zany or (even worse) campy.  Take Black Widow's introductory scene - absolutely pitch perfect in showing her approach to espionage, we get a great laugh out of her stating "this idiot is giving me everything" (while she is bound to a chair, dangling over a ledge!), and then get to see her open a can of whup-ass on her apparent captors.  This scene further demonstrates that Whedon not only knew how to bring out the fun in having these characters appear on screen, but he also gets them, and portrays them faithfully to the lore and history of their comic appearances.  It's just small things that illustrate this, like the way Thor wipes the blood from his mouth with a wry grin when he's fighting Hulk - you just know he's relishing in having found a worthy opponent to fight.

Finding a consistent tone for this film could have been the major Achilles heel - how do you match the tech-savvy, rock-star persona of Tony Stark with the earnest and straight-forward heroism of Captain America?  How does Thor's realm of 'magic' and 'gods' remain believable alongside the super science behind Iron Man and Hulk?  Yes, there are moments when this threatens to unravel - Cap's sudden appearance, and Freedom-espousing monologue, just as Loki is about to zap some museum patrons in Germany does come perilously close to being a bit, well, cheesy.  Fortunately Whedon knows to keep things moving briskly along, and we get a brawl between Cap and Loki (I love how they both react during it, indicating they both realise that they've never fought someone like their opponent before), followed by a suitably attention-grabbing arrival of Iron Man, and the film keeps the tone correctly balanced.

Loki is a classic villain - dastardly, heartless, yet at once charming and strangely likeable...

As well as Whedon's script and story pacing, the success of the film owes a tremendous deal to its cast, who you can sense are growing in confidence in their roles.  Of course, even before this film RDJ absolutely kills it as Stark (like Jackman and Wolverine, Christopher Reeves and Supes, it is unlikely that anyone will ever be able to embody the role as definitively), but if the cast had any reservations or uncertainty about these characters coming together (which is understandable) by the end of the film they are all invested and, you can sense, having fun.  As great as the ensemble is you can still pick out individuals for praise - and firstly, it's worth pointing out that Tom Hiddleston, as fan-favourite Loki, shows absolute gleeful commitment to his character right from the start.  Thinking about the great moments his character gets, both in terms of out and out villainy and wicked humour, it is clear he knew what a great role he had in this film (in fact an email came to light in which he thanked Whedon for the role he had written for his character, so this is truly the case).  And what a great villain Loki makes for this film - you need a threat that justifies 'Earth's Mightiest Heroes' coming together, and he delights in tormenting and manipulating them, even when he allows himself to be their captive.

His is not the only star-making turn in this film - that a film so strongly based on an ensemble cast can boast two of these performances is remarkable.  Going in to this film Hulk had a pretty chequered cinematic past, and the casting of respected actor (but not box-office draw) Mark Ruffalo, instead of inviting previous actor Edward Norton back, might have indicated that Marvel Studios and Whedon may have continued the trend of being uncertain how to handle this character on film once again.  Well, that emphatically turned out to not be the case: Ruffalo's performance, under-pinned by many subtle touches that entirely fit the character (I love the remorseful glance he throws at Black Widow as he is about to 'Hulk out' on the Helicarrier), and Whedon's script giving him (again) some great lines and fantastic, crowd-pleasing moments, proved it IS possible to get the character right on screen.  And it also brought Ruffalo to mainstream star status.  It was a turn that left audiences and comic fans wanting more - hopefully Marvel will one day give Hulk another solo movie, which, pleasingly, Ruffalo is open to.

 Everyone was unprepared for how memorable Ruffalo would be as Bruce Banner in this film

The film's greatest success - above its cracking script, great performances, and finding a consistent tone for a number of different characters - is arguably how it fulfils the long-held wishes and dreams of comic fans and movie audiences in ways that no one would have imagined possible until recently.  Comic book and Superhero movies have had such a chequered history that when Marvel Studios teased they would be building to this through Nick Fury's cameo at the end of 'Iron Man', that excitement would always be tempered by a realistic nervousness, based on the number of comic films that have disappointed.  Although Whedon may have struggled to write a story that gave sufficient grounds to bring these characters together as a team, he clearly knew what an exciting and momentous event seeing them finally brought together onscreen would be.  So we get a final act that must rank as one of the best action-sequences of the decade, and certainly in the Superhero genre.  After a two-act build up that teases, with semi-team ups between Iron Man and Captain America, as well as spats between Thor and Iron Man then Hulk (addressing those endless fan debates and desire to see what happens when these powerful heroes clash!), a superbly crafted shot shows our heroes back to back, facing a threat that truly justifies the intervention of not just one, but a team of Heroes.  When the camera pans round them for that iconic shot, Whedon is milking the moment for all it's worth - and rightly so, as it is a moment of wish fulfilment for countless comic book fans after years of hoping and dreaming, and the culmination of Marvel Studio's planning and universe building.

For comic book fans and geeks, this was the film's key money shot - in both senses of the term...

Whedon's skilled handling of the characters and balancing their screen-time continues right the way through this sequence - each hero gets a moment of awesomeness in their own right that is completely befitting their character.  We see Cap being the selfless leader, Thor bringing the thunder (and lightning), Iron Man using his tech and smarts to bring down his foes (whilst delivering a snappy one-liner), we see why Black Widow and Hawkeye are the best at what they do (as well as some amusing insights in to their working relationship); and of course, we get to see Hulk smash.  I don't think there are many films that boast a moment as uproariously crowd-pleasing as his 'fight' with Loki!  This is topped off with possibly my favourite shot of the entire film - in a single shot the camera follows the battle, showing the Heroes fighting individually and then back to back against the invading Chitauri army, combining their powers and abilities to take down their foe (underpinned by Alan Silvestri's rousing theme music).  For me, it completely captures those double-page pieces of artwork from comic books (known as spread pages)that depict tremendous and epic scenes showing Superheroes battling against their foes (or each other) - with incredible detail to pore over, as well as capturing the essence of what makes the characters so cool and awesome.  This scene, and the rest of the climactic battle, quite simply never get old, no matter how many times I watch it.

This scene illustrates why I would argue that 'Avengers Assemble' is the greatest Superhero comic book movie of all time; with moments like that it absolutely captures why so many people have ever picked up and read a comic book, pored over the art, and avidly followed the adventures of their favourite characters.  This film captures the sheer joy and awe that great comic book stories and characters have evoked in readers at some point in their lives; whilst there are many comics that prove how challenging, intelligent, insightful and artistically profound the medium can be, the first reason anyone picks up a comic is to be entertained and wowed by great art, stories and characters.  It is a joyous form of escapism.  Does this mean that 'Avengers Assemble' is a better comic book/Superhero film than the highly lauded 'The Dark Knight'?  Again, I would argue 'yes'.  Whilst that film is a masterpiece, successfully capturing how comics have (in the right hands) been capable of making insightful socio-political observations, as well as treating the psychology of superheroes very seriously, as I have said it is 'Avengers Assemble' that conveys the sheer joy of comic books, the awesomeness of the characters and stories, more effectively than any other film in the genre.

For comic book geeks and Superhero movie fans, if you'll pardon the metaphor, this film is joy on an almost orgasmic level ('geek-gasmic', if you will!); it is like the best sex you've ever had with your most perfect partner!  Sure, it starts out tentatively and a little uncertain in some places, with an occasional, awkward fumble - but then it becomes as exhilarating and joyful as you hope it would be, building to a satisfying conclusion that leaves you with a contented feeling afterwards.  Whedon apparently stated he wanted to make a film that would give audiences the same experience of some of his favourite blockbusters when he was growing up; he more than achieved this - he gave us a defining genre classic, a box-office milestone, and an iconic moment in pop-culture.  It is an uplifting, entertaining joy of a film, and one I will never tire of watching.


...the film should also be given due credit for bringing Schawarma to everyone's attention, of course.